{"id":1784,"date":"2026-05-19T18:39:00","date_gmt":"2026-05-19T15:39:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/apps.khaledbelal.com\/tayyibat\/?p=1784"},"modified":"2026-05-19T14:44:23","modified_gmt":"2026-05-19T11:44:23","slug":"animal-feed-and-flour","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/apps.khaledbelal.com\/tayyibat\/en\/animal-feed-and-flour\/","title":{"rendered":"Animal Feed and Flour in the Tayyibat System: How Are Meat, Fish, and Chicken Quality Affected?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Introduction<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Animal feed and flour in the Tayyibat System are not distant details from human health. Dr. Diaa Al-Awadi, may Allah have mercy on him, drew attention to the idea that the quality of meat, fish, and chicken does not begin only from how food looks on the plate. It begins much earlier: from what the animal, bird, or fish itself was fed. If an animal grows quickly because it was fed leftover baked goods, flour, pizza, cake, and croissants, this does not mean the food has become better. It means the food chain has entered a different path; a larger size does not equal higher quality. Therefore, the question within the Tayyibat System becomes: What did the animal eat before the human ate it? Did the increase in size come from suitable food, or from dietary loading that affects the quality of meat, fish, and chicken? If you are new here, it may help to start with What Is the Tayyibat System?<\/a>, review Allowed and Forbidden Foods in the Tayyibat System<\/a>, read about Dr. Diaa Al-Awadi<\/a>, and finally you can download the Tayyibat System PDF<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Animal Feed and Flour: Why Does the Question Begin Before the Human Plate?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

When discussing meat, fish, or chicken, some people may only ask about cooking, taste, price, or the size of the piece. However, the Tayyibat System goes one step earlier: how was this creature raised? What was it fed? Was its food suitable for its nature? The protein that reaches the human body is not separate from its raising process. An animal fed suitable feed is different from an animal whose size is pushed upward through baked goods, flour, and leftover foods. Therefore, food quality is not judged by appearance alone, because the outer shape may deceive, and rapid size gain may hide a defect in the food chain itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The American Farmer Story: How Can Size Increase Within Weeks?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Dr. Diaa Al-Awadi, may Allah have mercy on him, mentioned an important example of an American man who used to buy leftover and broken baked goods from restaurants and bakeries, such as croissants, pizza, cake, pastries, and pies, then feed them to sheep, cattle, fish, and chickens. Within weeks, the size of these animals, fish, or birds would increase, and then they would be sold as if bigger size were proof of success. But the question in the Tayyibat System is not: Did the size increase? The question is: What food caused that size increase? Does this path create real quality, or does it create rapid swelling? Here, the idea of the food chain becomes clear. A person may not eat flour directly, but they may still consume its effect indirectly when flour and baked goods enter the feed of animals, fish, or birds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bigger Size Does Not Mean Better Food Quality<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

One common mistake is linking size with quality. A person may see a large fish, a plump chicken, or a huge piece of meat and assume it has higher nutritional value. But in the Tayyibat System, size alone is not enough for judgment. An animal or fish may grow quickly because its food is loaded with starches, baked goods, and flour leftovers, not because it was raised on suitable food. This changes how food should be viewed. Quality is not in external fullness only, but in the food source and how compatible it is with the creature\u2019s nature. Therefore, the question is not \u201cHow big did it become?\u201d but \u201cWhat created this size?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Flour in Animal Feed: Where Is the Problem?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Flour and baked goods in animal feed are not just cheap ways to increase weight. They are inputs that change the nature of the food chain. The same flour criticized by the Tayyibat System inside human food does not become neutral when it enters animal feed. If an animal, fish, or bird is fed leftover baked goods, pizza, cake, and croissants, this input enters its formation and dietary path before reaching the human. This is where the concern appears: a person may think they are avoiding flour in their own food, while still receiving its effect through another route if the protein source itself depends on unsuitable feed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fish Feed: Why Does the Source Matter?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Fish in the Tayyibat System are not understood by the word \u201cfish\u201d alone. There is a difference between fish that live on suitable natural food and fish raised in an environment that depends on manufactured feed, leftover foods, or unsuitable inputs. In the example mentioned by Dr. Diaa Al-Awadi, may Allah have mercy on him, the man was feeding tilapia from leftover baked goods, and even using the waste from raising chickens within the same food circle. This makes the question about fish a question about source before type: is it clearly sourced marine fish, or farmed fish raised on unknown feed? Therefore, food does not become suitable simply because it is called \u201cfish,\u201d because the raising method and feed affect the judgment within the Tayyibat System.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chicken: Why Is \u201cLocal\u201d or \u201cHome-Raised\u201d Not Enough?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Chicken in the Tayyibat System is not judged simply by calling it local or home-raised. The more important question is: what did it eat? How was it raised? Was its food suitable, or was it based on baked goods, food leftovers, and flour? In the transcript itself, a question appears about whether chicken raised at home can be eaten, but Dr. Diaa Al-Awadi, may Allah have mercy on him, does not make home raising alone enough for judgment. A bird may be raised at home, but still eat unsuitable inputs. Therefore, the question should move from \u201cWhere was it raised?\u201d to \u201cWhat was its food source?\u201d because the nature of the feed enters into the quality of the food that finally reaches the human body.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Red Meat: Why Is Source Safety the Main Condition?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Red meat differs from chicken and farmed fish in the Tayyibat System, but it does not leave the rule of source. Meat safety is not judged by the name alone: beef, buffalo, lamb, goat, or camel. What matters most is that the source is clear, that the raising method is closer to what suits the animal, and that the meat is not the result of rapid dietary loading or interventions that increase size at the expense of quality. Therefore, eating meat within the system is connected to controlling the source, quantity, and cooking method, not merely to the idea that \u201cmeat is protein.\u201d Protein here is not just a number; it is part of a chain that begins with the animal\u2019s own food.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Food Chain in the Tayyibat System<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The food chain in the Tayyibat System begins with the land, feed, and raising process, then passes through storage, cooking, and digestion. Therefore, food should not be viewed only when it is ready on the plate. The animal eats, the fish eats, the bird eats, and then the human eats the final result of this chain. If the beginning is filled with flour, baked goods, and food leftovers, the result cannot be understood separately from that beginning. In this sense, food quality is not only a kitchen decision. It starts from the source. That is why the question \u201cWhat did the thing we eat actually eat?\u201d becomes essential within the Tayyibat System.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Animal Feed and Flour Between Appearance and Reality<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Food may be large in size, attractive in appearance, easy to sell, and commercially profitable, but it does not necessarily carry real quality. In the American farmer example, the size of animals and fish increased within a short period, but the increase came from inputs that the Tayyibat System does not view as suitable food. Here, the difference appears between market logic and body logic. The market may welcome size, price, and speed, but the body deals with the internal effect. If the protein source depends on unsuitable feed, the food may eventually become a burden instead of beneficial nourishment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How Can a Reader Choose Protein Within the Tayyibat System?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Choosing protein within the Tayyibat System begins with the source, not the name. It is not enough to say: this is meat, this is fish, or this is chicken. It is better to ask about the food source and raising method, and to avoid what is connected to industrial feed, unclear farms, or inputs based on flour and baked goods. Quantity also matters; protein is not a field for daily excess without awareness. It should be taken within a complete system that considers digestion, comfort, and not overloading the body. Therefore, suitable protein is what combines a clearer source, calmer quantity, simpler cooking method, and lighter effect on the body.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why Is It Not Enough to Say \u201cNatural Food\u201d?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The word \u201cnatural\u201d can sometimes be misleading. A chicken may be raised at home, but its food may still be unsuitable. Fish may be alive in a farm, but it may feed on something that does not suit it. Meat may be fresh, while the raising method itself is not reassuring. Therefore, the Tayyibat System does not stop at the name, shape, or general impression. True naturalness does not only mean that the food did not come from a factory. It means that its path from beginning to end is closer to the nature of the body, the creature, and the food chain. This is why animal feed and flour are important: they reveal what comes before the plate, not only what appears on it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Animal feed and flour in the Tayyibat System open an important door to understanding food quality from its roots. The quality of meat, fish, or chicken is not in size, shape, or speed of growth, but in the food source, raising method, and what entered the food chain before reaching the human. Through the example of leftover baked goods, pizza, cake, and croissants, Dr. Diaa Al-Awadi, may Allah have mercy on him, explains that increasing the size of an animal or fish within weeks does not mean real quality. It may mean dietary loading that affects the entire food chain. Therefore, the practical question becomes: What did the animal, fish, or bird eat before we ate it? From here, a more accurate judgment of food quality begins within the Tayyibat System.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Read Also<\/h3>\n\n\n\n